Tennis playbook
Tennis looks simple: two players, no draw, one winner. Surfaces, match formats and settlement rules make it less so. This playbook is the tennis layer on top of Levels 1 to 3.
How the tennis market works
There are matches most days of the year, around the world. Prices usually appear once both players are known, often only the day before, and firm up as money arrives (see What happens to a line until kickoff; for tennis, read the first serve).
- The biggest events are the hardest to beat. Grand Slams and the top tour events attract the most money, and their closing lines are among the most accurate prices in tennis. If a number promises a big edge there, suspect the number first.
- Lower tiers are softer, with less to go on. Qualifying rounds, Challengers and ITF events can be priced further off, but books charge more vig, take smaller bets, and news about fitness is thinner. The sport's integrity cases have centered on its lowest tiers. If a low-tier price moves hard with no news you can find, pass.
- One match says little. A few points in a tiebreak can decide it. Judge a long run of bets by closing line value, not a week of results.
The match winner
The moneyline is the core tennis market. With no draw, the two players' fair chances add to 100%, so the CLV lesson's even split removes the vig directly: take half the extra off each side.
- Big favorites still lose. A favorite at −500 must win more than 83.33% of the time to profit, and even at a fair price it loses about one match in six, to an injury, an off day or a tiebreak that goes the other way (see Why a 70% win rate can lose money). Stringing heavy favorites into a parlay multiplies the vig along with the chances.
- Best of three or best of five. Nearly all professional tennis is best of three sets; men's Grand Slam singles are best of five. A longer match gives the better player more sets in which to come through, so the same matchup makes a heavier favorite at a men's Slam. The example below works the arithmetic.
Surface
- Clay slows the ball and kicks it up: longer rallies, fewer free points on serve, more breaks.
- Grass is the fastest and lowest-bouncing, and rewards big serves.
- Hard courts sit in between and host more than half of tour matches. Indoor courts usually play faster than outdoor ones, and speed differs between events on the same surface.
So a player's rating on one surface can mislead on another; surface Elo keeps a separate rating for each. The grass season is short: in 2024 about one tour-level match in ten was on grass, so grass records rest on few matches. On fast courts big servers win more of their service games, so sets turn on fewer breaks and more tiebreaks, which helps a big-serving underdog stay in a match.
Retirements and walkovers
This is the tennis settlement trap. A walkover, a withdrawal before the match starts, voids bets at most books. A retirement, a player stopping partway through, is where books differ. The common rules:
- The bet stands once the first ball is struck, and the player who advances wins.
- The bet stands only if at least one set was completed; otherwise it is void.
- The bet stands only if the match is completed; otherwise it is void.
Games handicaps, over/unders and set bets often have rules of their own, and some books settle a market already decided when the player retired. Read the house rules before you bet: the same match can win at one book and be void at another. As with listed pitchers in the MLB playbook, the house rule can matter as much as your read.
Fitness and the schedule
- Injury news. A player carrying an injury is more likely to withdraw or retire. A recent retirement or a medical timeout last round is worth noticing, and the market notices too.
- Fatigue. A long match the round before, a late-night finish with a match the next day, or extra matches in qualifying can leave a player tired. It is real but hard to measure, and widely watched: ask whether the price already reflects it.
- Start times are estimates. Usually only the first match on each court has a fixed time; the rest follow the match before, so a match can start hours late or on another day, and rules on postponed matches differ by book.
Games handicaps and over/unders
Books also offer a games handicap, like Player A −3.5 games, and an over/under on the games played.
- The set count drives the over/under. With a tiebreak at 6-6, a best-of-three match has 12 to 26 games in two sets and 18 to 39 in three. Game counts bunch into two groups and lines often sit between them, so whether the match reaches a deciding set often decides the bet.
- Tiebreaks add games. A tiebreak set ends 7-6, so two strong servers tend to play more games. A tiebreak usually counts as one game, including the longer one some events play in a deciding set; check the rules.
- A handicap is not the moneyline. Win 7-6, 3-6, 7-6 and you win the match but lose the games 17-18; a player can also lose the match while winning more games. So −3.5 games asks about a margin, not just a win. Compare each bet's fair chance with what its own price needs, never one market's chance with another's, as in the NHL playbook's puck-line example.
Motivation and tour context
A player with little to play for late in the season, or treating the week before a Slam as practice, makes an easy story, and easy stories are usually priced: a final nudge at most. Head-to-head records are mostly a handful of matches across years and surfaces; weigh them well behind surface ratings and current form.
In-play
Tennis is bet heavily in-play, and the price moves after every point. The server wins most service games, more so on the men's tour and on fast courts, so a break of serve moves the price a lot, and breaking back is common. Studies of point-by-point data find points nearly independent: what looks like momentum is mostly chance. Live prices usually carry more vig, and the pace invites quick, emotional bets. Decide your limit before the match starts, and don't chase a losing bet in-play.
Props and same-match parlays
Set betting (like 2-0 or 2-1), aces, double faults and “will there be a tiebreak” usually carry more vig than the moneyline. Same-match parlays stack correlated legs: a favorite to win 2-0 and the under both ride on straight sets, and the book prices that in and keeps more than on a single bet. Read the parlays lesson first, and stake any parlay smaller than a single bet.
A pre-bet checklist
- How does your book settle a retirement or a walkover in this market?
- What surface, indoors or out? Rate both players on it, not overall.
- Best of three or best of five?
- How fit and fresh is each player?
- Which market fits your read? Compare each bet's fair chance with what its own price needs.
- What has the line done since it opened, and why? (Why lines move)
- Have you shopped the price? Compare books first (Line shopping).
- Is the stake small? One shared misread, like a wrong read of a player's fitness behind several bets, can sink a few at once, so size for a bad week (Variance and drawdowns).
How Consensus Edge helps
We compare prices across many sportsbooks and remove the vig, so you can see what the market really thinks and where the best price is. We blend Square (the books), Sharp (our models) and Crowd (prediction markets) into one chance, and we re-price regularly before each match, so line moves after injury and fitness news reach our numbers, though right after news any board, ours included, can trail the books. Each bet shows BET, LEAN or NO EDGE; BET and LEAN carry a small suggested stake, and we publish how our picks did against the close. NO EDGE is not a grade: it means a fair price, or a market we don't grade. Start on the slate or read how it works, and bet only what you can afford to lose.
Example. One matchup, two formats (illustrative prices, not live data). Say your ratings give the favorite a 60% chance to win any one set against this opponent; that is an assumption, not a price with the vig removed. To turn it into a match chance, treat every set as a separate 60% chance. Real sets are not fully independent, so read the result as a guide.
Best of three: the favorite wins 2-0 with 0.60 × 0.60 = 36.00% or 2-1 with 2 × 0.60 × 0.60 × 0.40 = 28.80%, a 64.80% match chance, fair about −184. Best of five: 3-0, 3-1 and 3-2 come to 21.60% + 25.92% + 20.74% = 68.26%, fair about −215. Same players, same set chance: the longer match helps the better player.
Now a men's Grand Slam prices the match at favorite −230, underdog +190. Carry over the best-of-three figure and the underdog's 35.20% looks worth a bet: +190 needs 34.48%, and a $100 ticket would be worth 0.3520 × $190 − 0.6480 × $100 = $66.88 − $64.80, about +$2.08 on average. In the right format the underdog's chance is 31.74%, and the same ticket is worth 0.3174 × $190 − 0.6826 × $100 = $60.31 − $68.26, about −$7.95. The favorite is no bet either: −230 needs 69.70%, above 68.26%, so a $100 ticket is worth 0.6826 × $43.48 − 0.3174 × $100 = $29.68 − $31.74, about −$2.06.
The market had the format right. Remove its vig by splitting the extra evenly, as in the CLV lesson: 69.70% + 34.48% = 104.18%, and taking half the extra, 2.09, off each side leaves the favorite a fair 67.61% and the underdog 32.39%, within a point of the best-of-five figures and far from the best-of-three ones. The apparent edge came from the wrong format, not the price. Notice too how much rides on the input: at 58% a set, best of five gives 64.75%, fair about −184, the same price the best-of-three match gave at 60%. A small error in the set chance moves the price as much as the format does, so an apparent big edge on a tennis moneyline is usually a wrong input, not a real one.
Terms in this playbook
Closing LineMoneylineSurface EloOver/UnderSame-Game ParlayCorrelationSquareSharpCrowdBETLEANNO EDGE