Experts vs the closing line

Every expert on this page is scored the way we score ourselves: against the closing line. Over a few hundred bets a win-loss record is mostly luck; beating the closing line is a steadier signal. Our own row, Consensus Edge (graded calls), is the set the CLV page calls recommended picks: every pick the product recommended, over the window chosen here. The 90-day view matches that page's default.

Price CLV compares the price the expert posted (or, when their page printed none, the market price when we first saw the pick) with the best price at the last capture before kickoff. For spreads and over/unders it counts only picks whose line did not move; line value counts the points gained. An expert is ranked once there are 50 scored picks and at least 30 of them carry a price CLV; until then the row reads Building sample. Our own row follows the same rule. Picks we cannot grade, such as a spread or over/under on a fight, are left out of every figure. Picks come from each expert's public articles; names link to the source.

Experts and Consensus Edge ranked by price closing-line value.
ExpertOutletPicksW-L-PROI Price CLVBeat the closeLine valueStatusReasonsLast pick
Consensus Edge (graded calls)233see /trust/clvn/a+1.5pp (n=233)52%n/aBeating the close. Above our target, on a sample too small to call that settled.n/aSep 13
Jason LoganCovers177-10-0-22.2%+1.6pp (n=6)100%+0.40 ptsBuilding sample (n = 17)matchup 33%, injury 17%Oct 4
Mark LammeyPickswise145-9-0-32.6%-1.7pp (n=8)38%+0.15 ptsBuilding sample (n = 14)matchup 37%, trend 34%Oct 4
Peter DeweySports Illustrated106-4-0+17.3%-3.2pp (n=2)0%+0.00 ptsBuilding sample (n = 10)matchup 30%, numbers_model 30%Oct 4
Andy LangWagerTalk109-1-0+41.3%-1.5pp (n=10)40%n/aBuilding sample (n = 10)matchup 53%, trend 16%Oct 1
StuckeyAction Network93-6-0-29.8%-2.7pp (n=5)20%+0.43 ptsBuilding sample (n = 9)matchup 27%, injury 21%Oct 4
Danny HowardCovers77-0-0+44.5%-3.5pp (n=7)0%n/aBuilding sample (n = 7)matchup 47%, trend 33%Oct 3
Mike SpectorSportsbook Review52-3-0-17.7%-0.2pp (n=5)20%+0.00 ptsBuilding sample (n = 5)matchup 33%, trend 33%Oct 4
Neil ParkerCovers52-3-0-19.2%-1.0pp (n=2)50%+0.00 ptsBuilding sample (n = 5)numbers_model 28%, matchup 28%Oct 2
Brad PowersCovers53-2-0+16.3%n/an/a-0.40 ptsBuilding sample (n = 5)numbers_model 25%, line_value 25%Oct 1
Chris FarleyPickswise42-2-0-2.3%n/an/a+0.75 ptsBuilding sample (n = 4)matchup 33%, trend 25%Sep 30
Nick GriffithAction Network43-1-0+60.8%n/an/a+0.00 ptsBuilding sample (n = 4)matchup 33%, line_value 25%Oct 1
Vaughn DalzellNBC Sports31-2-0-36.9%-2.4pp (n=3)0%+0.00 ptsBuilding sample (n = 3)matchup 43%, trend 28%Oct 3
Brandon AndersonAction Network33-0-0+92.6%n/an/a+0.50 ptsBuilding sample (n = 3)line_value 30%, trend 20%Oct 3
Collin WilsonAction Network21-1-0-4.5%n/an/a-0.50 ptsBuilding sample (n = 2)matchup 40%, numbers_model 40%Oct 3
Javan ShoueyPickswise11-0-0+73.0%n/an/an/aBuilding sample (n = 1)matchup 33%, line_value 33%Sep 30
Ethan DiamandasSportsbook Review10-1-0-100.0%n/an/an/aBuilding sample (n = 1)matchup 33%, trend 33%Oct 2